“50 is the new 40”


“Aging is not lost youth, but a stage of opportunity and strength” ~Betty Friedan

A few months ago I blogged about my views around the idea of “50 being the new 40” and how it bothered me that we, as a culture, were perpetuating this myth, disowning parts of our actual age and the natural benefits we draw from our years of life experience. I still stand behind this viewpoint, but after reading a section from “Passages”, originally published in 1976 by Gail Sheehy, I have a new appreciation for how the idea of pushing back the clock in the last few decades has some merit.

Read along to Sheehy’s words with me and see what you think: “The ‘I should’ of the twenties, which gives way to the “I want” of the thirties, becomes the “I must” of the forties.”  The author ends there, defining the decades, not even giving mention to the 50’s, other than by omission. Interesting exclusion to consider, as culturally in the 1970’s, people in their 50’s may have seemed oldish and well beyond the urgency of the “I musts” reaped from their 40’s. As I read this passage it seemed anachronistic and very much out of step with the way I perceive the battle cry of each decade.

I do remember the 1970’s and how older people seemed, well, older back then. Yes, I was in my teens at the time, so it makes sense to have this youthful impression, but it goes beyond that. Think about the previous “Greatest” generation, born between wars and before 1946. I recollect my own mother’s story, which mirrored many young women back then, with pressure to marry early before becoming a dreaded spinster. In my mom’s case, she was the second-to-last in her group to marry, at the tender age of 19. The pressure to have children came next and my mom had three by the time she was 24. Interestingly, my youngest sibling was born in 1961, the same year the birth control pill became widely available. If couples in their early 20’s were having children, then by the time they were in their 40’s, grandchildren or at the very least empty nests were the reality, and most of the milestones had already been checked off the list. It is no wonder that people seemed older back then.

Fast forward to today. Marriages often occur a decade or so later and so do all the other milestones, pushing everything by 10-15 years. I can see how the urgency Sheehy spoke about the 40’s now resembles more a person in their 50’s-60’s and beyond.

That’s why I have rethought the idea about 50-is-the-new… because we have more time to meet life’s milestones at a slower pace and consequently can savor our decades more. A fun fact that contributes to the natural delay: On average, we have gained an additional 30 years to our life span in the last century. It’s no wonder we feel like 50 could conceivably be the half way mark instead of the beginning of the end.   That’s why I push for owning and being in each decade fully, but also can appreciate how far we have come to make 50 seem more like 40.


  1. Hello it’s me, I am also visiting this website on a regular basis, this site is in fact nice and the people are really sharing fastidious thoughts.

  2. My husband and i have been absolutely joyous when Michael could carry out his researching from your precious recommendations he grabbed out of your blog. It is now and again perplexing to just choose to be handing out facts many people have been trying to sell. And we all discover we now have the blog owner to be grateful to for that. The illustrations you made, the easy web site navigation, the relationships your site assist to instill it is many extraordinary, and it’s leading our son and our family consider that this article is fun, and that is really important. Thank you for all!

    • Ahh thanks so much Jane They are from the very park we did your shoot at. Just drfiefent locations but also that same tree I have photos of your beautiful kidlets sitting under. We actually got a bit lost an ended up on the side of a little road and with the light fading quickly decided to do some right then and there hehehe

  3. It’s hard to come by well-informed people about this subject, but you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks

  4. Very good written article. It will be useful to anybody who employess it, including yours truly . Keep up the good work for sure i will check out more posts.

  5. When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Thanks!

  6. magnificent post, very informative. I wonder why the other specialists of this sector do not understand this. You should proceed your writing. I’m confident, you’ve a great readers’ base already!

  7. I simply wanted to type a quick note to express gratitude to you for all of the marvelous guidelines you are showing here. My time consuming internet look up has finally been recognized with really good facts to share with my contacts. I would believe that we website visitors actually are unequivocally lucky to dwell in a decent website with so many awesome professionals with great hints. I feel really blessed to have come across your web page and look forward to some more fun minutes reading here. Thanks once again for everything.

  8. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  9. What’s up, after reading this remarkable article i am too happy to share my familiarity here with friends.

  10. Richard has a good point that the future will not be like the past. It’s also fair enguoh that the government protect the commons which cannot be left to the free market to protect. Richard’s point is Peak Oil. While he’s right that there is a one-off supply of oil, tars, peat, coal, methane, shale, there is so much of it that 7 billion people can have lots of fossil fuel energy for another hundred years without worrying. There are two far more important points than Peak Oil. They are Peak People and Peak Technology. Peak People, contrary to the Malthusian Club of Rome fears and the horrors of African demographic disaster, is a done deal in Japan and some other countries. China will be at Peak People within a decade or so. My estimate is that Peak People will occur in 2037. In most places it will be by choice, and in some by Malthusian maelstrom [same as always in genocidal conflict]. In some it might be by sars, H5N1 or HxNy. Peak Technology is not even in the crystal ball. “The singularity” is more like what we have with no upper bound even theoretically evident. We have barely touched DNA. Even the fundamental laws of physics on which everything is founded changed barely a century ago to include the special and general theories of relativity. Cars are still driven by large primates with their blundering brains. When autonomous Google cars roam the streets, costs will plummet, safety zoom, speeds accelerate, fuel efficiency go through the roof, comfort improve and people will be able to cerf Cyberspace and yak on the phone without being badgered by police.While that technology develops, Len Brown is wanting to go back to the 19th century and build more railways – which ignore the fact that there is an [almost] infinite array of destination/departure combinations and that even a simplistic simpleton can see that a railway line can go between only a minuscule number of them. Other movement modes have to be used to get to and from the trains. And you can’t just pop a lot of large parcels in the boot of your train.The Flynn Effect is due to natural selection and nutrition. Women do eugenics on a grand scale and universally women select intelligence, humour and cognitive competencies in their lists of desirable DNA in potential fathers for their children. Eugenics is unfashionable but women are still wildly enthusiastic for it [much to the disappointment of many male suitors]. But women can’t avoid concealed DNA such as haemachromotosis by looking at a bloke. 23andMe and Complete Genomics can help them. Genetic selection is just around the corner. Genetic engineering [take out the bung genes and put in some good ones and “crank up the intelligence too please”. Who among us would have wanted their mother to choose less intelligence for them?

  11. Very interesting subject , regards for putting up. “Nothing is more wretched than the mind of a man conscious of guilt.” by Titus Maccius Plautus.

Speak Your Mind